Richard Hally wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Policy rename dilemma. I have a version of policy ready to go that
supports both strict and targeted policy. The version I wrote
creates targeted policy as policy and policy-sources and the strict
as policy-strict and policy-strict-sources. The problem with this is
that if I put it in Rawhide people upgrading will switch from strict
policy to relaxed and require a relabel. If I change it to strict
equals policy and policy-sources, with policy-targeted and
policy-targeted-sources, than I am stuck with that even though
policy-targeted will be the default in FC3, which seems wrong.
Comments?
Dan
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
If "targeted" will be the default going forward, it seems that the
thing to do is make the change now. A one time relabel at this stage
is not as bad as having to make a switch later.
For those that want the "strict" , they can set up the links the way
they prefer after the update.
Is the "strict" policy close to what is now in place?
Strict is the current policy with several fixes.
Dan
Richard Hally
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
