On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 16:42, Thomas Molina wrote: > Please do not use that abomination called kudzu to determine policy. > > First off, userland tools have no place in determining policy in my > opinion, especially not in the case of removable media. > > Secondly, I despise kudzu. It is an abomination which get removed > forthwith from any system I maintain. Oh, come on now, Thomas, please, don't hold back; tell us how you really feel :-). Seriously, though, I am curious to know what is wrong, here. Aside from the fact that kudzu is for hardware detection and SELinux is not hardware, why is kudzu (in your opinion) is so "evil"? That question asked, I have to say that I am inclined to think that as long as kudzu is around in a system with SELinux, we are going to have to accept the need for it (kudzu) to work withing that (SELinux) environment. I do not yet agree that there is need for kudzu to alter policies, but I am going to reserve judgment until after further discussion. -- Lamont R. Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. http://www.GuruLabs.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
