Re: Should Yum and up2date understand SELinux roles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Mitchell wrote:

On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 09:09:39AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:


Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:09:39 -0500
From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should Yum and up2date understand SELinux roles
Reply-To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Tom Mitchell wrote:



Should yum check "id" for sysadm_r role?



....


No if unlimitedUsers tunable is set the following rule needs to be added to rpm.te

ifdef(`unlimitedUsers', `
domain_auto_trans(staff_t, rpm_exec_t, rpm_t)
')




Thank you unlimitedUsers was set (will make the change and retest soon). Will your small snip of policy be in a future version of rpm.te?




Yes it is in policy-1.9.1-2.

Yum update should grab it.

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux