Tom Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 09:09:39AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
....Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:09:39 -0500 From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Should Yum and up2date understand SELinux roles Reply-To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tom Mitchell wrote:
Should yum check "id" for sysadm_r role?
No if unlimitedUsers tunable is set the following rule needs to be added to rpm.te
ifdef(`unlimitedUsers', ` domain_auto_trans(staff_t, rpm_exec_t, rpm_t) ')
Thank you unlimitedUsers was set (will make the change and retest soon). Will your small snip of policy be in a future version of rpm.te?
Yes it is in policy-1.9.1-2.
Yum update should grab it.
