Re: List of 'base' packages that are always present

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:49:01AM +0100, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> is there a list of packages that can be assumed to be installed on any
> given Fedora system, and thus never have to be listed as dependencies?
> 
It isn't. In reality there are some packages like "filesystem" that nobody lists as
a dependency. But in general all dependencies should be listed.

> minimal build environment?
> 
There two build environments. For building source packages ("srpm-build" package group)
and for building binary packages ("build" package group) defined in Koji
(a Fedora build system). E.g.:

$ koji list-groups f30-build srpm-build
srpm-build  [f30]
  bash: None, mandatory  [f30]
  fedora-release: None, mandatory  [f30]
  fedpkg-minimal: None, mandatory  [f30]
  glibc-minimal-langpack: None, mandatory  [f30]
  gnupg2: None, mandatory  [f30]
  redhat-rpm-config: None, mandatory  [f30]
  rpm-build: None, mandatory  [f30]
  shadow-utils: None, mandatory  [f30]

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux