>>>>> "DČ" == Dan Čermák <dan.cermak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: DC> I tried to submit the package and during review I was made aware of DČ> the package bear-devel, which is already in the fedora DČ> repository. Actually the source package name is just "bear", it merely produces bear-devel, bear-engine and bear-factory. So the repository https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bear already exists, and your conflict is more than just an issue with confusion about bear-devel. DČ> My question is: how should I address this issue? Renaming my DČ> proposed package to Build-ear would be an option, but the binary DČ> should still be called bear, to avoid confusion for users. Should I DČ> ask the upstream author about their opinion concerning renaming? Fortunately there is nothing in the distribution which provides /usr/bin/bear, so there wouldn't be a problem there. I could see perhaps persuading the bear maintainer to rename their entire package to "bear-engine" and have "bear-engine-devel" and "bear-engine-factory". Its binaries are "bend-image", "image-cutter" (which itself seems conflict-prone), some things with a "bf-" prefix, and "running-bear". But any conversation about renaming is one you should have with the bear package maintainer. - J< _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/72MTLA7PIOCXJDEFLBGKIPI56EBD4WMV/
