>>>>> "RM" == Re Mianbao <santiago.verdu.01@xxxxxxxxx> writes: RM> The fedora packaging guidelines state clearly that packages must not RM> contain any Kernel Modules. What is the recommended method of RM> distribution for an LKM? Get it into the kernel proper. Fedora simply isn't going to accept a kernel module package; they're just not reasonably supportable. And the Fedora kernel maintainers isn't going to carry patches which aren't already accepted upstream. RM> Is there any chance that Trustbase could be added to the Fedora RM> Repos? Not outside of a path through the upstream kernel. I have no idea how you would go about getting code into the upstream kernel, but I would start with a discussion and patches sent to the appropriately mailing list for the relevant kernel subsystem. If you're going to roll your own things in COPR, you should probably look at how RPMFusion packages up their kernel modules: https://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 Or look at DKMS, but I've never used it and can't provide a reference. - J< _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/Z2HND37CFXKWZEVIVHVBL5QQ75VKEZXV/
