On mardi 30 janvier 2018 16:11:49 CET nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, > > Now the technical PR is submitted > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-srpm-macros/pull-request/1 > > and waiting for action from the go-srpm-macros maintainers, I took (quite a > long) time to refresh and flesh out the corresponding packaging guidelines > proposal. It should be fairly complete now: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging > > I'd appreciate review to check if I have forgotten an important case, if > people understand the text, if they have enhancements or corrections to > propose, and so on. > Then I will push it FPC side again. > > Actual practice should be fairly simple and self-explanatory, the proposal > length can be scary but that's because it documents all kinds of corner > cases that required digging through specs and mailing lists to find > resolution examples before. The basic Go packaging skeleton will be > sufficient is most cases without requiring to read any documentation. > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Mailhot > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hello Nicolas, Could you add two full examples, one for binary package, one for library package, like in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ Go#Sample_RPM_Spec Putting it all together (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ More_Go_packaging#Putting_it_all_together) is nice but don't understand if it is for a binary or a library. Also, is there any plan to update Gofed with these new guidelines? If it's not automated like today, we will lose time instead of gaining some in the end. Best regards, Robert-André _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
