On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:52:57 +0100 Federico Bruni <fede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey Michael > > Many thanks for your feedback! > > Il giorno gio 25 gen 2018 alle 11:57, Michael Schwendt > <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 07:02:54 +0100, Federico Bruni wrote: > > > >> [...] > > > > > >> %install > >> rm -rf %{buildroot} > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections > > > > Yep, I know, I fixed that. > > > > > >> %license COPYING > >> > >> %doc README.* COPYING > > > > If including the file COPYING as a licence file already, duplicating > > it also as a separate doc file isn't necessary and should not be > > done. > > I must duplicate it, since upstream is copying that file in the doc > dir: > > [extractpdfmark-1.0.2]$ grep COPYING Makefile > $(srcdir)/config.h.in $(dist_doc_DATA) COPYING compile \ > dist_doc_DATA = README.md README.ja.md COPYING > > > So if I remove it from %doc, I'll get an error: > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/share/doc/extractpdfmark/COPYING > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/share/doc/extractpdfmark/COPYING > > Should I ask upstream to fix it and put COPYING under > /usr/share/licenses? You could remove the copy in /usr/share/doc/extractpdfmark at the end of %install to avoid this problem. Paul. _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx