Re: Versioning of packages combining projects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 22 January 2018 at 16:45, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:30:43AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On 2018-01-22 5:07 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > > ntp-refclock-0.1 is combined with ntp-4.2.8p10. The majority of the
> > > code compiled for the package comes from ntp (the drivers and some
> > > code that the drivers need), so I think the version or release needs
> > > to include the ntp version.
> > 
> > Are they split into separate sub-packages, or is it just one big package
> > built from the two sources? In the former case, I've seen packages just
> > independently version sub-packages.
> 
> There is just one package. It contains only one executable which
> includes all drivers (that were enabled in ntp configuration) with the
> wrapper that allows the drivers to run.

In that case, I'd add
# includes ntp drivers and some code
Provides: bundled(ntp) = 4.2.8p10

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPMFusion   http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
        -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux