On 12/04/2017 10:20 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I would like to hear opinion of other packagers about naming. We have `parallel` utility implemented in Rust which is drop-in replacement for GNU parallel.
This longs for an explanation - I do not comprehend, what you are trying to do?
Replacing (== obsoleting) one existing package with a *rust* package (cough ...) seems to be quite absurd and non-sensical to me.
I was thinking how to name package and how people would expect it to be named. So far options are: * rust-parallel * parallel-rust * parallel-rs I dislike first one because it is not ending up in completion while second and third are quite good.
I'd prefer rust-parallel, because this matches the conventions for other languages (python, perl, ...).
Ralf _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
