Sanford Rockowitz <rockowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the swift reply. Your request for the a link to the SRPM > pointed me in the right direction. Even though the -n option to > fedora-review specifies the name of the spec file in the current > directory, fedora-review was using a slate spec file in the input > srpm. So it seems to be a workflow issue, not a spec file syntax issue. Didn't Fedora-review warn you that the spec files differed? It really should wave a big red flag in such cases. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpbmrC1sNngw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
