On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello @all,
>
> unfortunately I was not able to find updated information how to do that.
>
> %{_udevrulesdir}/foo.rules is fine in %files and BuildRequires:
> systemd, but there are more questions:
>
> * Should %udev_rules_update be put into %post?
> * Should %{?systemd_requires} be presented in spec? probably something else?
Looks like non of above:
(03:31:38 PM) dreisner: ignatenkobrain: no, it isn't
(03:32:12 PM) dreisner: assuming it does something silly like 'udevadm
control --reload'
(03:33:38 PM) ignatenkobrain: dreisner: yes, it does udevadm control
--reload ...
(03:33:47 PM) dreisner: not needed.
(03:34:01 PM) grawity: does udev pick up changes automatically now?
(03:37:38 PM) dreisner: it has for years
(03:38:08 PM) dreisner: used to do it by inotify. more recently it
just looks at timestamps prior to event processing, with some amount
of rate limiting.
> --
> -Igor Gnatenko
--
-Igor Gnatenko
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
