Re: Packaging FPGA bitstreams

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>  - Compiling the Verilog source code to a bitstream requires highly
>    proprietary tools and will never be possible in Fedora.

Depending on what you actually consider these data to be, this should be
somewhat covered by:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Use_of_pregenerated_code

Alternately, this stuff seems to be something we could consider to be
firmware with the added benefit that we have source.

>  - Writing the bitstream to the FPGA is possible with GPL tools.

That's always nice.  Otherwise I wouldn't see the use of packaging a
random binary blob that you can't actually use for anything.

>  - There are currently some proprietary bits in the bitstream, but I
>    hope those will be removed at some point.

If considered "firmware", this might not even be an issue depending on
the actual license.  I don't know if we've ever had to address the
question of proprietary firmware for which we have source.  That's
probably a question for the legal list.

 - J<
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux