Re: Packages reviews done outside the process.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-02-27 22:11 GMT+01:00 Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx>:
> It's not a review if it doesn't follow the process.   That said,  I
> personally don't see any harm with constructive critiquing prior to an
> official review.
>

btw, I already asked them in the past to contact FPC about it few
months earlier and yet nothing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517

I see few problems
1. context loss, there's no feedback on bugzilla
2. making it harder for fellow packagers to participate in the review.
3. requires Fedora packagers to rely on external platforms.
4. undocumented process

I agree that bugzilla is an horrible tool for packages reviews but it
should concerted with the whole Fedora community and not done behind
closed doors.
In the end, it could be acceptable (or not), but it has to be discussed.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux