Re: (fix typos) Re: Packaging:NamingGuidelines Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 14:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Switching to packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[...]
> In this link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages ;
> where we read :
> 
> Release Tag for Pre-Release Packages: 
> 
> 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}%{?dist}   
> 
> And I'm proposing : 
> 
> 0[.%{X}].%{alphatag}[.%{Y}]%{?dist} 
> 
> is just better IMHO .

Personally, I think it's too complicated due to the optional nature
of X and Y parts and it's just as easy to get wrong if subsequent
alphatag breaks release monontonicity and the package maintainer
doesn't notice it.

With X being currently mandatory, at least you know you must always
increase it every time you update the package, so monotonicity is
preserved.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux