-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2015 07:16 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reading the guidelines about the naming of conflicting > python2/python3 binaries [1], and I have doubts about if it is up > to date. It says: "The unversioned executable must be the python2 > version.", is this still true? In the example shown some lines > before, the unversioned binary goes to the python3 package. IIRC, this is specific to tools for python itself. So things like /usr/bin/python and /usr/bin/easy_install must be the python 2 version. For end-user packages, the current policy for F22+ is that they must be the python 3 version. > > With python3 as the default I guess the unversioned binary should > be the python3 one. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Naming > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZVuMYACgkQeiVVYja6o6NoQgCfdb5DIEpvGpThEJFLp9tia3Qn yEoAniyzWYVuFVZAVH+qLSmwS/c87QMo =bs2j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
