RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello folks,
I'm looking at this feature:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages

<quote>
 How To Test

    Running checksec should always report only

Full RELRO Canary found NX enabled PIE enabled No RPATH No RUNPATH

otherwise a tracking bug should exist for the respective packages	
</quote>


On a current Rawhide installation I'm seeing lots of potential failures, for example:

Partial RELRO Canary found NX enabled No PIE No RPATH No RUNPATH


Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the hundreds ?

I will do my best to filter out any false negatives and group the results per package but this still leaves quite a big number of bugs to report.


How do you feel about reporting all of these offences automatically ? Are there any known exceptions which should be mentioned in the wiki page above ?


--
Alex
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux