On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:41:13PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Anyway, what I don't get is why we're to the point of tossing out the > primary anti-bundling rule when FESCo has always had the power to > override any FPC decision. So FPC says "this isn't good packaging" and > FESCo can say "we understand, but quality packaging here is subservient > to the distro's mission". That's always been the case, even when the > "E" stood for "Extras", and I suspect it would have worked just fine for > this situation. Instead we're here debating whether FPC should be in > the business of reviewing bundling issues at all. I think it's because overriding a different group seems hostile, even if it isn't meant that way. And FESCo doesn't want to feel like they're second-guessing other groups all the time. But, if FESCo and FPC want to (more, I guess) explicitly spell out that FPC takes a purist approach and that it's FESCo's place to make exceptions when they serve greater Fedora goals, maybe that could work? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
