On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:15:58AM -0600, William Moreno wrote: > I am packaging only one version build with phyton 3 and naming it mkdocs, > but I am not sure it is better to name this docs as python3-mkdocs and > build python-mkdocs also. As I understand the guidelines, the python-prefix convention applies to _python modules_ — libraries intended to be imported by other applications. If this is, instead, an application which just happens to be written in Python, the prefix doesn't make any sense to me. > Really I not sure how to proceed in this case, but I think if it would be good > to have both versions available for booth Python releases and provide by > default the version for Python 3 when a user install mkdocs with dnf. What would be the advantage of having two versions? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
