Re: Proposal: Remove BuildRequires: exceptions from the guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "VS" == Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> VS> s/RPM/rpmbuild/, and in addition to running shell scripts it is in a
> VS> state where it can unpack common archive types and apply patches?
>
> RPM can do that, but you should not assume how.  It could link in
> libraries to do that without actually installing any executables it
> could call.  Or it could call things which are not in $PATH.

Sure (well except that it's still rpmbuild, not rpm...). I wasn't
making any assumptions how it does that, actually pretty much the
opposite. I just listed its features/state that can be assumed so that
people won't start adding build dependencies e.g. for tar and gzip
whenever they have a tgz source tarball unpacked by %setup or one for
patch when they have patches to apply with %patch etc.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux