On 21/03/2015 20:00, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try >> "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly >> with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin). >> >> Why isn't this recorded in the RPM provides (and why is there no mention >> of jemalloc in >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries)? Are >> there any other known cases outside Mozilla products? I found bug >> 788500 about unbundling jemalloc from redis. > > If jemalloc would be its own package, we would probably use that for > nfs-ganesha too. Currently glibc/malloc is used, but jemalloc is well > tested by the nfs-ganesha community and could have some benefits. I have > not checked the sources of jemalloc, so I can not say if I would be > a suitable maintainer for it. nfs-ganesha is already using jemalloc, repoquery says: $ repoquery --whatrequires 'libjemalloc.so.1()(64bit)' ... nfs-ganesha-0:2.1.0-11.fc21.x86_64 nfs-ganesha-fsal-ceph-0:2.1.0-11.fc21.x86_64 nfs-ganesha-fsal-gluster-0:2.1.0-11.fc21.x86_64 ... Paolo -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
