Tom Callaway wrote: > I don't foresee any situation in which a file containing a list of > copyright holders that is distinct and separate from the file containing > the license text (pause to catch my breath) would be necessary to treat > as %license. %doc should be sufficient there. > > That said, if you end up in a situation where you (the packager) feels > strongly that the upstream separation of copyright holders and license > text would somehow cause the license text to be incomplete, feel free to > either bring those specifics to this email list, or tag them both as > %license and explain it in a comment in the spec file. Thanks, that answers my second question. Then I'll continue including lists of authors in the same subpackage as the license, but with %doc, unless I come across some really special case. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpZurSDFo1vB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
