On 2/1/2015 8:49 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 08:03:00 -0700, Brad Bell wrote:
I have the case where the master (rawhide) has the following verison and
release
Version: 20150000.4
Release: 2%{?dist}
The other branches have not had any builds with this version of the
upstream source.
It it correct to just merge the master into origin/f21 and then push as
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide
might be suggesting ?
Perhaps I should change the release to
Release: 1%{?dist}
and the log from
* Sun Feb 01 2015 Brad Bell <bradbell at seanet dot com> - 20150000.4-2
to
* Sun Feb 01 2015 Brad Bell <bradbell at seanet dot com> - 20150000.4-1
Why would you want to do that? The %dist macro is not there without
reason. It ensures that the build for an older branch is _lower_ than
the build for newer branches. If you need to touch/update only an
old branch, notice:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
Else, the Dist Tag guidelines are these:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#The_.25.7B.3Fdist.7D_Tag
1. If I used a higher dist (same version) number in f20, then it should
also work in f21 ?
2. Where does el6 fit in the order relative to f20 ?
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
