Packaging of /usr/share/doc/{%name}-{%version} directories not 100% clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi guys,
I was looking into bug #1114586 and it reveals a significant number (400+) of RPM packages which leave empty directories under /usr/share/doc when installed with --excludedocs.

I've looked at a few of them and they had either

%dir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/some_file

or

%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}

in their spec files.

The ones which don't leave behind empty directories specify only the documentation files, not the name-version directories as part of the file list.

In my test all 400+ directories under /usr/share/doc are empty, no files in them. Obviously we don't need these directories either. It is very likely people who use --excludedocs will complain about these empty directories as well.



The Packaging Guide doesn't say anything about these name-version directories, whether they should be specified in the spec file or only the indivisual files specified. I'd like to hear your opinion on this packaging situation before I go ahead and file hundreds of bugs into Bugzilla.


Thanks,
Alex
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux