> Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2014 um 16:49 Uhr > Von: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > An: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Betreff: Re: when does package become status stable > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 04:12:36PM +0100, Martin Gansser wrote: >> I ask specifically of this package, because I already created it on 15 October. >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12999/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc20?_csrf_token=da3c05212efdead8bf6960b4d45af1997a7af4f9 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12982/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc21?_csrf_token=da3c05212efdead8bf6960b4d45af1997a7af4f9[https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12982 /nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc21?_csrf_token=da3c05212efdead8bf6960b4d45af1997a7af4f9] >> Is there something wrong on this ? > > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#All_other_updates[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#All_other_updates] > > A package must get a sufficient karma threshold in bodhi (by default, > +3) or wait one week in updates-testing. At that point, the maintainer > can request for it to be pushed to stable. This is done manually by > release engineering, generally once a day. the package nuvolaplayer is already since 16 October in update-testing (10 days now) http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/20/SRPMS/ why isn't it already in stable ? Martin -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
