On 29/08/14 10:18, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:57:57 +0200 > Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hey there, >> >> currently we're unbundling all used JavaScript libraries upstream in >> Horizon aka. OpenStack Dashboard. >> >> We currently don't have a package for jquery-ui in Fedora, e.g Debian >> has. >> >> The version debian has, is 1.10.1, latest release from jquery-ui >> upstream is 1.11.1 >> >> Of course, both versions are not that compatible, some files were >> renamed, etc. >> >> Would it be ok to package 1.10.1 for Fedora instead of latest version? >> >> openstack-dashboard would be the first package to depend on this. > > I think this is a case for the Web Assets feature [1] and in my opinion > you should start using versioned package names (jquiry-ui-110, > jquery-ui-111, etc), because there might be others with different > requirements, eg. Kimchi (currently under review [2]) uses 1.10.3 (I > hope try are at least compatible among the micro versions) > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126990 > In fact, I am using Web Assets, putting those JS libs to %{_jsdir}/(upstream name). Actually, I was considering to use 1.10.4, which is packaged as XStatic-jquery-ui on pypi. Matthias -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
