Re: Package that has a BR: on itself

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-08-28 14:05 GMT+02:00 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:55:14 +0200
> Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 08/27/2014 08:17 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>> > How do you build a package in koji when the package requires itself
>> > to be available?
>>
>> I seen a lot of packages where it was needed for %check section.
>> If this is the situation (you have to investigate that). Just comment
>> out that BR and %check section. Build it. Then uncomment and build
>> again. Of course if you can put there %boostrap macro, you will easy
>> work for others.
>
> And you might try building an older version that didn't have yet the
> dependency first, then build the latest. You can also talk to the
> maintainers, because they should know how to resolve the cyclic
> dependency properly


So, a lot of options.

Wouldn't it be better if we had a packaging guideline forcing the spec
to either have something like a %bootstrap macro, or at least contain
a comment _documenting_ how to bootstrap the package?

- Thomas
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux