Re: Fedora default services (was: Re: F15 Feature - convert as many service init files as possible to the native SystemD services)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:14:16AM +0100, MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote:
> 2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:38:07AM +0100, MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote:
> >> 2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > ÂThose might be
> >> > able to start defining a category of "things needed to run a desktop
> >> > session" or something.
> >> >
> >> > iptables,
> >>
> >> no chance to disable this
> >>
> > I'd be more inclined to ask what benefit we have to turning the firewall off
> > vs having a more permissive set of firewall rules by default. ÂAFAIK,
> > turning the firewall on doesn't currently turn on any additional daemon --
> > it just sets up the defined rules.
> >
> >> I guess ip6tables too?
> >>
> > Yep.
> >
> > Would you be willing to write up a Packaging Draft and add it to the FPC
> > tracker? ÂIf not, I'll bring it up in the Packaging Meeting on Wednesday
> > morning.
> 
> I'm not Fedora developer, I just create service files :)

Okay... I doubt we'll nail this down for a while then....  Here's the ticket
I've opened:

https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/41

I have a feeling those categories don't account for everything yet... For
instance, readahead, abrtd... look in your /etc/init.d/ directory on F14 and
tell me what things that are there could have a justification.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgppFzF__SkYM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux