Re: Revised systemd Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/02/2010 10:58 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Okay -- one thing is whether we want to specifiy that services either
> install unit files or systemvinit files but not both (in the same package.
> A subpackage for the alternate init system would be fine.)  The idea being
> that there's several ways that having the sysvinit can confuse sysadmins.
> Off the top of my head I can think of:

The subpackage idea seems like the cleanest way to permit packagers to
provide this option, but minimize admin confusion.

$foo-sysvinit seems like a sane scheme.

~tom

==
Fedora Project
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux