David Timms wrote:
Could we have an "external software requirement" category or
sub-category in comps that packagers could use to put together similar
groups of packages needed by specific external software packages - like:
|- Desktop
|- Servers
...
|- Languages
|- External software installation requirements
{ eases the install of external software by installing Fedora packages
that such software needs to be able to run on Fedora. The external
software will still need to be obtained from it's distributor, will
often need further manual configuration to be usable, and is not
supported by the Fedora project }
|-- ldap browser
|-- vmware server
|-- vmware server console
Is the fact that the external software is mentioned by name a potential
problem ? Would for example "pc virtualization server" resolve that ?
Are there any real problems in any of the above ?
- we could require that only external software, that could never be
properly packaged in Fedora due to either third-party or our
constraints, would be allowed to have such a comps entry.
- Some people seem to call external software "third party software".
This is a bit deceptive as most of the software packaged in Fedora is
written by third parties (and their communities). Yet it might be better
terminology.
So far it seems no one is objecting to this proposal (at least in
fedora-packaging list). Since this isn't directly a packaging issue, is
this the most appropriate forum for such a discussion ?
Cheers,
David Timms.
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
