Re: Update guidelines for using darcs based sources in packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed January 7 2009, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> 2009/1/7 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>:

> > 2) %darcs doesn't seem to be a good choice for macro name if it's
> > intended for use in the Haskell Guidelines.  Perhaps this shouldn't be
> > part of the the Haskell Guidelines?
>
> Like i said before, please rename it.  %darcs is a temporary name
> only, and i was looking for comments and suggestions. Would
> %darcs_timestamp be acceptable?

The current Naming Guidelines[0] use %{alphatag} for this value.

Regards,
Till

[0] 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux