On Friday 02 January 2009, you wrote: > Le jeudi 01 janvier 2009 à 21:09 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit : > > > but for me > > the "fontpackages" package name sounds pretty weird. I think similar > > packages are usually called foo-common; was "fonts-common" ever > > considered? > > I rather like the way it expands in nice self-explanatory > fontpackages-filesystem and fontpackages-devel binary packages. Oops, sorry, I hadn't noticed that there's no main package. -filesystem and -devel don't sound bad/odd at all - the scenario I would have found quite weird would have been if one would for some reason explicitly install a package called fontpackages and get no font packages installed. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
