Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > TK> yelp owns it. There's a question of whether packages which have > TK> gnome help should Require yelp or not. > > What about a package that _only_ provides gnome help? The > system-config-* packages have split out their documentation and I'm > reviewing the new packages, but am stuck on this issue. > From my point of view that the help button in the app should work, the new package doesn't need to split out the gnome-help portion as the app would need to require it anyway. And if the app requires it, the app package can also require yelp. However, maybe we need to decide whether it's okay for the help menu item to "not work". (ATM I believe the app appears to not do anything if yelp is not installed. Not sure what happens if yelp is installed but the help pages are not available.) If others think it's okay for Help to not pop up a help window then the sane thing to me would to move ownership of the directory into filesystem. > TK> If yelp is not Required, then filesystem should own > TK> /usr/share/gnome/help. If yelp is required, the filesystem > TK> ownership will do no harm. > > This would imply that any package other than yelp or filesystem which > owns /usr/share/gnome/help has a bug, I guess. More to file. > Yeah, after we get /usr/share/gnome/help into filesystem. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
