On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:45:45AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 17:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:12:25PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > So as I mentioned before we have an OCaml Windows cross-compiler as > > > part of the Fedora MinGW project: > > > > Everyone's happy with me to go ahead with this? > I am not, but I am sure if I understand you correctly. > > Is your plan to build mingw packages as part of building Fedora packages > within the Fedora build system? If yes, I am opposed to doing this. I'm a bit confused by this. You are aware that we are planning to build lots of mingw packages in Fedora (using the build system) to enable cross-compilation? This has been discussed to death already, and approved, so it shouldn't be news to anyone. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Windows_cross_compiler http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?version=&component=&target_milestone=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=mingw&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc= > Is your plan to add support to your ocaml package to enable you to reuse > your ocaml Fedora rpm.specs to build mingw package outside of Fedora? > I'd consider this to be "your private pleasures" and to be "outside of > Fedora's business". No, I would like to build the cross-compiler from the ocaml.spec, instead of doing a separate review request for a new mingw32-ocaml package. (Plus the libraries too as mentioned in the original email). Rich. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
