On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 00:20 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:31:34PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 15:47 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > In > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description > > > > > > I suggest changing README.Fedora to README.Dist, see for an > > > argumentation: > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat > > -1 > > > > Leave such implementation details to the packager's discretion. > > It is only a (controversial) recommendation and I never wanted to make > it a guideline. But in most of the case the file is not fedora specific, In many cases such READMEs are not distro-specific, either. > it is pâckage specific so I think it should be reflected in the name. Well, I find README.Dist or README.rpm to be more confusing than helpful. I prefer README.fedora, README.Fedora or README.first. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
