On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:11:31PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote, at 10/25/2008 10:47 PM +9:00: >> Hello, >> >> In >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description >> >> I suggest changing README.Fedora to README.Dist, see for an >> argumentation: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat >> > > But README.fedora may be _really_ Fedora specific issue > (e.g. for better performance another files are needed but packaging > them altogether cannot be done due to Fedora policy, as you and I wrote > on xtide-common package) These are not really fedora specific. If I was to review xtide I would have insisted on this file being called xtide-README.dist. For example it is also true for EPEL. And it is also certainly true for any free software distribution. So I think that this is a bug in xtide. Would you accept patches to correct this? -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
