2008/10/17 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx>: > Hello, > > In the librep there are some .el files, and Michal Jaegermann explained > in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250#c23 > that the .elc files are not needed (and sometimes harmful). This is not > very consistent with the Emacs guidelines. Maybe the guidelines could be > amended for this case? I think he's wrong. If something doesn't work when byte compiled (.elc), then that's a bug. When loading many lisp files at startup, byte compilation still provides noticeable speedup, even on recent machines. So, no, I'd oppose changing the guidelines in this regard. It's a bit like saying "we don't need .pyc" files, as we can work just from the .py files (except that emacs doesn't do automatic byte compilation in the way that python does if a pyc isn't present or is older than the .py). Michal does allude to one ugliness of byte compilation - you do often need a packages .el files around when doing byte compilation of another package for function definitions, and this can lead to bootstrapping needs (see emacs-vm and emacs-bbdb for an example). [As an aside, that package should really be putting its files in a subdirectory of %{emacs_lispdir}.] -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
