On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:39 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 02:57 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: [snip] > > I wouldn't want someone who needs to > > patch Makefile.[am/in] to wind up regenerating configure--that's silly. > It's not that silly, because newer automake/aclocal's require newer > autoconf's. Good point; but automake isn't terribly aggressive about this. For instance, I don't think automake 1.10 depends on any autoconf features/fixes past 2.59. In general, I think one is better off using the packaged configure until it breaks. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
