And why .so.0 file in the main package symlinks to the so in devel instead of linking to the .so.0.0.0 in main? Sergio On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Paul <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently libgdiplus is broken into devel and the main package as per > the packaging rules. However, the .so.0 files in the main package > symlink to the -devel, so without the -devel subpackage, libgdiplus has > problems. > > In mono, this is fixed (kind of) by having mono-winforms requiring > libgdiplus-devel (which pulls in libgdiplus if it's not already > installed). Not the best solution, but one which works. Obviously, this > can't be used for libgdiplus. > > Given the nature of libgdiplus can an exception be made to this package > so the .so file is bundled with the main package as well as the .pc > file? I know it breaks the packaging regs, but I can't think of another > way around it. > > TTFN > > Paul > > -- > Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen! > > -- > Fedora-packaging mailing list > Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging > > -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
