>>>>> "DL" == Denis Leroy <denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
DL> I would recommend %{_libexecdir}/%{name} which seems fairly
DL> common. Or possibly %{_libexecdir}/%{name}-%{ABI} or
DL> %{name}-%{version}, but does it really make sense to have multiple
DL> versions installed at the same time ?
My understanding of the purpose of libexec is that this is fine for
internal binaries, but not for binaries which are expected to be run
by the end user. However, I don't think libexec is mentioned by FHS
so I guess its up to us (FPC) to make a decision.
The only example that comes to mind of something that has a
non-standard location for binaries is kerberos (/usr/kerberos/bin) but
that seems to be more of a historical thing. What other options are
there? Something under /usr/lib? Does multilib come into this
decision at all?
- J<
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
