On Friday, 03 October 2008 at 11:48, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:34 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri October 3 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > However, one of my actual point is a bit different: Once one starts > > > formulating such a "template", people will start to nit-pick and to > > > argue on (missing) details (e.g. corner-cases) and in longer terms will > > > start to demand for "laws", "regulations" and "forms". > > > > I guess we have different pictures about such a template. For me it would be > > an itemized list, where each item is a summary of one guideline from all the > > Guideline documents, maybe with an URL that links to the specific guideline. > > The nit-picking should then only affect the normal guidelines. > Let me put it differently: I am referring to certain particular people, > of whom I find it very obious that they have no clue about what they are > doing in reviews. Oh, how I hate such vague accusations. Ralf! Please tell us exactly who you're referring to and what *exactly* makes you think they have no clue. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
