Le Mar 23 septembre 2008 11:54, Panu Matilainen a écrit : > Sure it would be possible to teach rpm to grok the name.arch syntax > for > (build)requires too, but it would require changing every depsolver to > understand it too, and *that* would be incompatible change in spec > syntax > as well. Whereas the new provide introduces precisely zero > incompatibilities. But that would fix the problem once and for all wouldn't it? Are the other solutions so fool-proof they won't need to be revised anyway? -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
