On Sunday, 14 September 2008 at 15:35, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 10:36 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Yes, I know, enlightenment is designed for small machines and quite > > fast > > on them. But those things I quoted and other sections in the > > description > > sound more like advertising than a proper description. Up to a > > specific > > point that's okay IMHO, but here the packager IMHO shoot way over the > > top. > > Wow. That is indeed too much information. :) I'm not sure how we should > "guideline" that, other than something like: > > == Descriptions == > Your package description should contain useful data about the package, > and answer the question "what is this and what does it do?". In general, > the description should not exceed 10 lines or so. Try not to put too > much here, this isn't an epic novel, it's just a package description. > Also, there is no real need to "advertise" the package here, so > statements like "this is the best perl module that has ever been created > by humans", while possibly accurate, are not terribly useful in > answering the question "what is this and what does it do?". +1 > OT: > Would an Enlightenment spin of Fedora be called "Eedora"? What about an > eepc Enlightenment spin? Eeeedora? ;) E^4dora? ;) Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
