On Monday 08 September 2008, Axel Thimm wrote: > We certainly can't afford to lose LSB compliance (I didn't knew > Groups: was referenced there), so indeed we need to step down a > bit. Regarding the LSB, I don't know whether the format of packages produced by rpm in current Fedora releases is LSB compliant even without any Group tag changes. If it is, I suppose making Group optional in specfiles does not necessarily mean losing LSB compliance, rpmbuild could just insert some fixed string as its value in the package headers it produces if the tag is not present in a specfile. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
