On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 17:06 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > I'm working on packaging perl-RT-Client-REST, a Perl module from CPAN. > It claims to be under the Perl license (GPL+ or Artistic) except for > one class, RT::Client::REST, which it claims is under the GPL since > the author copied those bits from RT, which is in fact under GPLv2 > according to the web site: http://code.bestpractical.com/project/RT (Request Tracker) > > Should the License tag be: > > License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and GPLv2 > > or just: > > License: GPLv2 IANAL, but I suspect that the combined work would be considered GPLv2, since Artistic 1.0 is non-free (and thus, GPL incompatible). ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
