Advise on the Samba4/OpenChange stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've been trying to package the OpenChange stack (OpenChange, Samba4 and
Heimdal) for Fedora, and I'm between a rock and a hard place on the
packaging of Heimdal (Samba's choice of Kerberos infrastructure).  I can
either include it in Samba4 (as we do upstream), and break the 'no
included libraries' rule, or I can propose Heimdal as a package, and
conflict with krb5-devel and krb5-debuginfo.

Similarly, the non-library parts of Samba4 do conflict with Samba3.
(but I'm happy to simply not provide those parts of the package, if it
comes to it).

Does anybody have any suggestions about the best way forward?

The reviews are at:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux