On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Now that wine is 1.0, I think it really deserves the same pariah > status that Mono should get. It's an API controlled by a single > corporation that is not 100% documented, complex, and been > reimplemented from the inside out. Where do we draw the line between > Mono compiling EXEs and DLLs that work under .Net on Windows and a > cross compiler compiling EXEs and DLLs that work on windows without > .Net? If you really want to make this argument, why don't we draw the > line at Mono?. Did you miss what happened in the runup to F9? We actually pulled pre-compiled stuff out of some mono packages...and it really pissed a few people off...but we did it. -jef -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
