Rex Dieter wrote:
Gianluca Sforna wrote:
sorry for the duplicate post, but I am afraid fedora-extras-list was
not the best place for this...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gianluca Sforna <giallu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mar 30, 2007 10:41 AM
Subject: Licensing issue in mantis
To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mantis (php) codebase includes a module which comes from a 3rd party
project and is licensed with a "free for non commercial use" style
clause which is, AFAICT, incompatible with the GPL.
Is removing the offending file from the rpm package during %install
enough?
Yes (imo).
On second thought, it probably ought to be removed from the source
tarball, on the chance that possible commercial use makes the srpm
non-re-distributable (depends on the exactly licensing terms, I guess).
-- Rex
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
