Re: rpm -i, "missing" file conflicts and brokenness with kmods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel,

There's a fundamental misunderstanding here about using rpm -i.  You
claim that it does not function for kmods.  Most of us consider your
examples for this an upgrade path rather than an install path.

We consider rpm -i only useful for the install path where there are no
other kernel modules of that name installed on the system.  So, when no
previous versions of a specific kernel module are installed and we use
rpm -i to install one, there are no file conflicts.  The package is
installed correctly.

Other cases are considered upgrade paths and we agree that rpm -U does
not give the desired behavior.  rpm -i should not be used for an upgrade
path as it does not work for any package at all.

Jack
-- 
Jack Neely <jjneely@xxxxxxxx>
Campus Linux Services Project Lead
Information Technology Division, NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4  EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux