[Bug 477320] New: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320

           Summary: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for
                    parallel programs
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: rjones@xxxxxxxxxx
         QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-p3l.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-p3l-2.03-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: 
OCamlP3l is a compiler for Caml parallel programs.

The OCamlP3l programming paradigm is skeleton programming. The
skeletons encapsulate basic parallel programming patterns in a well
understood and structured approach. Based on P3L, the Pisa Parallel
Programming Language, OCamlP3l skeleton algebra is embedded in a
full-fledged functional programming language, namely Objective Caml.

The skeleton programming approach used in OCamlP3l allows three
different operational interpretations of the same source program:

* the sequential interpretation which is deterministic, hence easy
  to understand and debug,
* the parallel interpretation using a network of computing nodes
  run in parallel to speed up the computation,
* the graphical interpretation, which is run to obtain a drawing
  of the parallel computing network deployed at run-time by the
  parallel interpretation. 

------------

rpmlint is clean.

The documentation is rather large (7MB), so I tried to "even
things up" by putting the documentation into a -doc subpackage.
However that leaves a rather small -devel package.  Does this matter?

Koji scratch build coming up shortly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]